Individual Rights Versus Public Order

 »  » Individual Rights Versus Public Order
Individual Rights Versus Public Order Rough Draft Norma Enriquez CJA 320 Joseph Cain October 16, 2003 Individual Rights Versus Public Order The American justice system faces difficult obstacles daily. A crime occurs and a series of actions proceed. Law enforcement responds the court hears the case and our correctional facilities face overcrowding with our overwhelming need to punish and incarcerate. Every aspect of this system has come under scrutiny with members of society falling under one of two categories: individual rights or public order advocates. One seeks justice with regards to human rights, the other, will sacrifice those rights in return for the safety of its citizens and threats to its homeland. The nature of the individual rights advocate is to hold true what is written in the Constitution, specifically the first ten amendments. "These rights are especially important to criminal defendants facing formal processing by the criminal justice system" (Schmalleger 9). Those accused of committing a crime have rights granted upon arrest beginning with their Miranda rights. Consequently, many people believe that if there is a threat to public safety, certain rights should give way in many instances.
Individual Rights versus Public Order
In facts, individual rights protect rights of individual from the government that would not treat them as they would be treated with bill of rights. Public orders ensure that individual rights are preserved through introducing measures that would preserve individual rights from being obeyed. Individual rights versus public orders have both advantages and disadvantages as outlined in the paper. With this in mind, this paper has examined both advantages and disadvantages of individual rights versus public order. Advantages of individual rights versus public ordersDisadvantages of individual rights versus public ordersIndividual rights versus public order essay papers
In essence, people have different views on the definition of individual rights with public orders. Although many find it hard differentiating the two terms, it is with no doubt; the two terms differ. According to Robinson (2009), individual rights are required by man’s rational nature, which as a result, they are supreme necessities for safe life in the society. With this regard, individual rights are fundamental in the sense that, they guarantee freedom for action that protects human rights. Individual rights include rights to life, liberty, free speech, pursuit of happiness and self defense among others. On the other hand, public orders are acts passed by the government or parliament which provides ways for justice against criminals. Public orders defend safety for citizens through reducing crimes for people to live a save life. With this regard, this paper seeks to examine advantages and disadvantages of individual rights versus public order. Individual Rights Versus Public Order Rough Draft Norma Enriquez CJA 320 Joseph Cain October 16, 2003 Individual Rights Versus Public Order The American justice system faces difficult obstacles daily. A crime occurs and a series of actions proceed. Law enforcement responds the court hears the case and our correctional facilities face overcrowding with our overwhelming need to punish and incarcerate. Every aspect of this system has come under scrutiny with members of society falling under one of two categories: individual rights or public order advocates. One seeks justice with regards to human rights, the other, will sacrifice those rights in return for the safety of its citizens and threats to its homeland. The nature of the individual rights advocate is to hold true what is written in the Constitution, specifically the first ten amendments. "These rights are especially important to criminal defendants facing formal processing by the criminal justice system" (Schmalleger 9). Those accused of committing a crime have rights granted upon arrest beginning with their Miranda rights. Consequently, many people believe that if there is a threat to public safety, certain rights should give way in many instances.